PUBLIC SAFETY. Image capture can provide real benefits to Public Safety organisations but it is not in widespread use. Why? IMS Research and Motorola solutions undertook research into this topic and found that whilst there is recognition of the benefits of image capture the lack of process, clarity regarding the applicable legislation and proven technical solutions has meant that officers and commanders have been reluctant to introduce it into day to day operations.
In the United Kingdom (U.K.), where and when photography may be taken is clearly defined under Article 8 of the Human Rights Act (1998). By law, every person has the right to respect for their private and family life. With respect to minor assaults, no images shall be taken without the formal consent of the victim or, in the case of a person under 17 years of age, an appropriate adult.
The research showed that different countries and regions are at different levels of maturity in the development of policies toward photography. Even on a cultural level some regions have barriers to overcome in order to fully adopt imaging in policing. But regardless of these challenges public safety officials recognise the benefits of having image capture capabilities as part of their crime prevention and law enforcement tool kit.
The research highlights clear benefits of using digital photography in frontline policing including review and comment on key areas such as:
Simplifying of the evidence audit trail
Enhancing the capabilities of officers at major operation/incidents
Entries » Blog » Is Digital Photography Widely Used in Public Safety? Author: David Parry
Is Digital Photography Widely Used in Public Safety? Author: David Parry
PUBLIC SAFETY. Image capture can provide real benefits to Public Safety organisations but it is not in widespread use. Why? IMS Research and Motorola solutions undertook research into this topic and found that whilst there is recognition of the benefits of image capture the lack of process, clarity regarding the applicable legislation and proven technical solutions has meant that officers and commanders have been reluctant to introduce it into day to day operations.
In the United Kingdom (U.K.), where and when photography may be taken is clearly defined under Article 8 of the Human Rights Act (1998). By law, every person has the right to respect for their private and family life. With respect to minor assaults, no images shall be taken without the formal consent of the victim or, in the case of a person under 17 years of age, an appropriate adult.
The research showed that different countries and regions are at different levels of maturity in the development of policies toward photography. Even on a cultural level some regions have barriers to overcome in order to fully adopt imaging in policing. But regardless of these challenges public safety officials recognise the benefits of having image capture capabilities as part of their crime prevention and law enforcement tool kit.
The research highlights clear benefits of using digital photography in frontline policing including review and comment on key areas such as:
To read more of the research relating to the use of image capture in public safety you can download the report ‘The Need and Case for Digital Photography in Frontline Policing’.
David Parry is Director, Solutions Marketing EMEA. David is on LinkedIn at uk.linkedin.com/in/davidgparry
Follow #SaferSmarterFaster on Twitter.
Join the Motorola Solutions Community EMEA at http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Motorola-Solutions-Community-6519590/about